Cognitive Biases: Laptops vs Paper — a useful case study on how to remember things (oh and biases)

Before we get into the Wednesday series on cog­ni­tive bias­es and fal­lac­i­es in full swing I thought it would be good to look at a sim­ple case study that not only applies to how we fall into bias­es uncon­scious­ly, but also teach­es us a lit­tle about how we process infor­ma­tion. For a lit­tle while now there have been a series of arti­cles float­ing around the web and pop­ping up from time to time based on the 2014 study by Mueller & Oppenheimer on mem­o­ry reten­tion with long hand vs lap­top note tak­ing. 1

It’s quite a salient top­ic to look at with the focus on appro­pri­ate meth­ods of ped­a­gogy and learn­ing in our mod­ern soci­ety, and the sud­den and sharp uptake of com­put­ers in the last two decades; thanks to Gordon Moore. Now the major­i­ty of these arti­cles focus on the study set­up by Mueller and Oppenheimer which looks at mem­o­ry reten­tion from a vari­ety of TED talks when stu­dents were asked to take notes in two dif­fer­ent modes: hand­writ­ing, and lap­top note tak­ing. That study found that stu­dents per­formed bet­ter at recog­ni­tion tasks when hand­writ­ing rather than lap­top note tak­ing. From this the major­i­ty of the arti­cles I have read sim­ply con­clude that hand­writ­ing is supe­ri­or to lap­top note tak­ing, that in the lap­tops vs paper debate tra­di­tion­al meth­ods come up trumps.

But is it real­ly? Well before we get into the psy­chol­o­gy behind learn­ing and mem­o­ry, it is worth not­ing a sim­ple cog­ni­tive bias at play here. Confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is a sim­ple bias of tak­ing note of the items or con­clu­sions that fit our exist­ing pat­tern of beliefs. Simply put the author of most of these arti­cles sub-con­scious­ly elim­i­nat­ed the infor­ma­tion that dis­agreed with their pre­sup­po­si­tion that using lap­tops in a class­room is detri­men­tal to learn­ing. Notably they ignored the link between lap­top use and ver­ba­tim tran­scrip­tion, and the cor­re­spond­ing hand­writ­ing and syn­the­sis based non-transcription.

This is just a sim­ple exam­ple of the prob­lem with cog­ni­tive bias­es. We sim­ply have a lot of them, and they are excel­lent at blind­ing us to alter­na­tive data and expla­na­tions that chal­lenge our pre­sup­po­si­tions. Furthermore there is no mal­ice behind the bias­es in many cas­es, which makes it hard­er to detect in a self-reflec­tive man­ner. However, being aware of our pre­sup­po­si­tions and our pre­dis­po­si­tion to cog­ni­tive bias­es sig­nif­i­cant­ly helps in iden­ti­fy­ing where our bias­es are affect­ing our rea­son­ing and think­ing. That is the main rea­son behind this Wednesday series, if we know more about some of the more com­mon bias­es it should help us inter­nal­ly defeat them.


Biases aside and back to learn­ing the­o­ry, as from the inter­view in this arti­cle: where thank­ful­ly the reporter has cov­ered the whole of the study, Mueller reflects:

We don’t write long­hand as fast as we type these days, but peo­ple who were typ­ing just tend­ed to tran­scribe large parts of lec­ture con­tent ver­ba­tim,… the peo­ple who were tak­ing notes on the lap­tops don’t have to be judi­cious in what they write down.”

This reflec­tion shows the under­ly­ing cog­ni­tive work­ing behind the study design of typ­ing vs hand­writ­ing. Indeed the claim of bet­ter mem­o­ry reten­tion from hand­writ­ten ver­sus typed comes from the lev­el of cog­ni­tive engage­ment, as in think­ing and pro­cess­ing, in the mem­o­ry task. If you are cog­ni­tive­ly engaged, such as you are when syn­the­sis­ing mate­r­i­al for a paper, then the mode of record­ing has lit­tle con­se­quence (so long as you record some­thing to be able to find it again sev­er­al months down the track).

There have been some stud­ies done with low- and high-cog­ni­tive load tasks, along with pos­si­ble low-cog­ni­tive load dis­trac­tion tasks (flip­ping coins etc) which show its the load of the task that affects reten­tion. Ultimately if you are cog­ni­tive­ly dis­en­gaged, such as sim­ply tran­scrib­ing notes for a lec­ture, then the ‘hard­er’ cog­ni­tive task of hand­writ­ing will gen­er­al­ly yield bet­ter results. 2

wpid-Photo-20141004215054I gen­er­al­ly rec­om­mend that peo­ple take notes in a ‘cog­ni­tive­ly dif­fi­cult’ fash­ion. What con­sti­tutes cog­ni­tive­ly dif­fi­cult varies per per­son as well, for some it may involve read­ing around the sub­ject before and after class, while for oth­ers it may be for­mu­lat­ing inter­est­ing ques­tions even if they are not asked in class. While for stu­dents who are learn­ing in a non-native lan­guage it may actu­al­ly mean typ­ing ver­ba­tim, as the very act of think­ing in a non-native lan­guage is a hard cog­ni­tive task. Indeed some of the stu­dents I had last year did this, and sub­se­quent­ly took pho­tos of the white­board after class to sup­ple­ment their notes. As per this amus­ing anec­dote on James McGrath’s blog here. This prob­a­bly wouldn’t be a use­ful task for many peo­ple with English as a native lan­guage, but for them work­ing across a lan­guage bar­ri­er it helped with both reten­tion and accuracy.

Realistically for long term mem­o­ry reten­tion the cog­ni­tive load should be high, and the mate­r­i­al should be reviewed reg­u­lar­ly. I rec­om­mend hav­ing a high cog­ni­tive engage­ment, even if it is via typ­ing, but review after 24hours and then 3 days and 7 days. Furthermore if the task is able to be used in a syn­the­sis fash­ion, by per­haps answer­ing ques­tions or writ­ing a per­son­al paper or syn­op­sis on the lec­ture at hand, then this will rein­force the cog­ni­tive load­ing of the task as well. As from the Mueller & Oppenheimer study abstract the ulti­mate dif­fer­ence appears to be the act of ‘pro­cess­ing infor­ma­tion and refram­ing it in their own words’ rather than the phys­i­cal mech­a­nism. So take notes well, and also take note of your cog­ni­tive biases.

Some tools for note tak­ing will be com­ing up in future Monday posts, and look for­ward to more cog­ni­tive bias­es on Wednesdays. Tell me what your pre­ferred note tak­ing method is in the comments.

About Chris


  1. Mueller, Pam A., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. “The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking.” Psychological Science, April 23, 2014, 0956797614524581. doi:10.1177/0956797614524581.
  2. Cf. Piolat et al, 2012; Makany et al, 2008 for cog load; and Schoen, 2012 for con­tra Mueller & Oppenheimer