Justification of beliefs — a philosophical perspective.


Further to the last few posts here is the pub­li­ca­tion announce­ment of an arti­cle that a friend at church has just had accept­ed for publication:


No, jus­ti­fied belief isn’t sim­ply click­ing the “Justify Text” but­ton in Word, but rather how we sup­port and ratio­nalise our beliefs. Interestingly Paul argues that even false beliefs can be valid­ly jus­ti­fied. I’ll let his own words do the talking:

More to the point, I argue that so long as one actu­al­ly has good rea­sons for belief, it is pos­si­ble to have a jus­ti­fied belief that is based on the worst pos­si­ble rea­sons. For exam­ple, bas­ing a belief on tarot card read­ings, irra­tional bias, coin flips, etc. is no bar­ri­er to dox­as­tic justification

He con­tin­ues to expand on his argu­ment in the brief on his own web­site here: http://paulsilvajr.com/2014/08/18/is-basing-really-necessary-for-doxastic-justification/

I’m look­ing for­ward to hear­ing more from Paul on it, and per­haps even mak­ing it along to his pre­sen­ta­tion on the 21st of August at Melbourne Uni.

About Chris